Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
mwiegand
146cb01450
plan(uid-collapse): drop l4d2-sandbox user; handoff to next session
Approved-but-not-executed plan to collapse the two-user model
(left4me + l4d2-sandbox) into one. The build-time-idmap that
translates sandbox writes back to left4me uid becomes a no-op when
source uid == target uid, so it's removed along with ~30 lines of
helper plumbing. Hardening already covers the same-uid attack
surface the sandbox uid was defending against, so collapsing makes
the architecture consistent with the web/server hardening-only
decision.

Plan: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-05-15-uid-collapse.md
Handoff: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-15-session-handoff.md

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 15:39:51 +02:00
mwiegand
f5f8db84ef
spec(session-handoff): hardening refactor landed and verified on left4.me
12-task subagent-driven refactor complete. left4me-server@1: 7.5 → 1.3
systemd-analyze. left4me-web: 8.7 → 4.1. All 6 Test 8 attack vectors
blocked post-deploy. One acceptable SECCOMP audit line per gameserver
restart (Breakpad's ptrace fork, blocked by design). Test tooling
(gdb, seccomp, libseccomp-dev) apt-removed from left4.me. uid-split
spec marked superseded.

No queued follow-up. Adjacent work: build-overlay-unit refactor and
the deferred drop-in / configmgmt-responsibility reshape.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 15:17:06 +02:00
mwiegand
152c313315
spec(session-handoff): point next session at hardening-refactor plan
The prior handoff pointed this session at running the test plan; that's
done (commit 461b8d0). Update the handoff to point the next session at
writing docs/superpowers/plans/2026-MM-DD-hardening-refactor.md against
the proven composition, including the two amendments (x86 arch,
PrivatePIDs) and the MDW permanent exclusion.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 13:43:37 +02:00
mwiegand
1df811e62a
spec(hardening): threat model + defenses survey + test plan; pivot handoff
Reframe the queued uid-split decision into a broader hardening analysis.
Audit found the same-uid attack surface (DB readable from srcds, ptrace
allowed, RCON stored plaintext) is closable by either uid split or
systemd directive composition; the three specs ground that choice in a
threat model, survey the defenses, and lay out a self-contained test
plan to run on left4.me next. uid-split spec deferred pending results.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 13:07:40 +02:00
mwiegand
9a2ab974e6
spec: session handoff pointing next session at uid-split
Short companion to the existing topic-specific handoff docs. Captures
the situationally-fresh state at the end of the 2026-05-15
deploy-dir-rethink + janitorial sweep so a fresh session can pick
up cold: what just landed, what's next (uid-split), what's NOT next
(build-overlay-unit, until uid-split decides), and the
decision-relevant signals that emerged during this session — mostly
that the 2-uid model was freshly load-bearing in the build-time-idmap
work and that srcds hardening already covers most of what a
gameserver-uid split would add.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 12:17:55 +02:00